Discussion:
[bug-mailutils] mailutils 3.2 build issue
Serguei Ivantsov
2017-03-20 08:23:11 UTC
Permalink
Hello,

Can not build mailutils 3.2

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612712
undefined reference to 'mu_assoc_ref'
I checked also building from vanilla sources with the same result.

include/mailutils/assoc.h does not contain definition for 'mu_assoc_ref'

--
Regards,
Serguei Ivantsov
Jordi Mallach
2017-03-20 14:26:11 UTC
Permalink
El dl 20 de 03 de 2017 a les 10:23 +0200, en/na Serguei Ivantsov va
Post by Serguei Ivantsov
Hello,
Can not build mailutils 3.2
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612712
/var/tmp/portage/net-mail/mailutils-3.2/work/mailutils-
3.2/libmu_auth/.libs/libmu_auth.so: 
undefined reference to 'mu_assoc_ref'
I checked also building from vanilla sources with the same result.
include/mailutils/assoc.h does not contain definition for
'mu_assoc_ref'
It was on my list for today to report this as well. Same build failure
on Debian unstable.

Jordi
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
***@sindominio.net ***@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/
Sergey Poznyakoff
2017-03-20 15:19:10 UTC
Permalink
Fixed by afbb33cf9ff750e93a9a4c1f51a3b62d584f056e.

Regards,
Sergey
Jordi Mallach
2017-03-20 23:36:15 UTC
Permalink
Hi Sergey,

El dl 20 de 03 de 2017 a les 17:19 +0200, en/na Sergey Poznyakoff va
Post by Sergey Poznyakoff
Fixed by afbb33cf9ff750e93a9a4c1f51a3b62d584f056e.
Am I missing something, or isn't the removal of this function breaking
the libmailutils5 API?

Jordi
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
***@sindominio.net ***@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/
Sergey Poznyakoff
2017-03-21 06:51:53 UTC
Permalink
Hi Jordi,
Post by Jordi Mallach
Am I missing something, or isn't the removal of this function breaking
the libmailutils5 API?
It is not a removal, it is complete revision. See commit
622bc770d5f8d7500fa409993c8fef8de5736962.
As to breaking the API, the commit in question bumped VI_REVISION
number, to mark its incompatibility with the prior revision of the
library.

Regards,
Sergey

Loading...