積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
2015-05-01 19:38:49 UTC
Doing
$ set `seq 88 111`
$ for i do COLUMNS=$i mail -H -f /tmp/ff; done
shows that back in mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1)
instead extra blanks were added to the left of the subject, once, twice,
until a full unicode char could be printed (on third time.) Therefore
this is a regression...
P.S. in mail (GNU Mailutils) 2.99.98 the way to get the full Subject is:
$ COLUMNS=1111 mail -H | cat
cat needed for COLUMNS to take effect.
(Alas for interactive usage none of
$ COLUMNS=1111 mail -E 'set columns=1111'
work.)
$ set `seq 88 111`
$ for i do COLUMNS=$i mail -H -f /tmp/ff; done
shows that back in mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1)
instead extra blanks were added to the left of the subject, once, twice,
until a full unicode char could be printed (on third time.) Therefore
this is a regression...
P.S. in mail (GNU Mailutils) 2.99.98 the way to get the full Subject is:
$ COLUMNS=1111 mail -H | cat
cat needed for COLUMNS to take effect.
(Alas for interactive usage none of
$ COLUMNS=1111 mail -E 'set columns=1111'
work.)